A Fast Company article criticizes brands for sending emails without real connections to customers. Consumers are getting annoyed at seemingly random emails from companies that happen to have their email. The author offers this advice:

The best way that brands should be responding is if they actually have something to say or contribute. Our patience for marketing fluff is low at the best of times, but now it’s positively toxic.

Image source.

Discussion:

• Think about the emails you have received recently. Which were more useful or meaningful to you than others? Why is that the case?

• What advice do you have for companies debating whether and what types of emails to send?