Governor Cuomo Address Sexual Harassment Allegations

In a video statement, Governor Andrew Cuomo addressed sexual harassment allegations made by three women. He begins well, explaining his decision to speak directly to the public on the topic, although lawyers advised him to wait. To preserve his image, this is a good call: research shows that his apology is unlikely to negatively affect lawsuit outcomes—and may even have a positive effect.

But his apology goes awry. He uses language that is classic in non-apologies, for example, “It was not my intention” and “I certainly never meant to….” In sexual harassment law, intent does not matter—only the impact. Further, this type of language typically doesn’t land well. People don’t care. Instead, he should focus on the impact on these women and perhaps on the office.

He also says, “I now understand that I acted in a way that made people feel uncomfortable.” This is problematic because first, as he says at the beginning, he is a lawyer. As a lawyer and as a political leader, he should know better. Such language is reminiscent of “I’m sorry if you were offended,” implying that it’s the receiver’s problem. A couple of days earlier, after the second allegation, the governor said, “To the extent anyone felt that way, I am truly sorry about that.”

To his credit, he says, “I apologize” and “I’m sorry,” which people do want to hear in these types of statements.

We will see what results from these allegations, in the midst of calls for his resignation. Governor Cuomo also is embroiled in charges that he lied about the number of Covid deaths in nursing homes. So far, he says that he will not resign.

McKinsey Pays Settlement for Work with Purdue Pharma

Management consulting company McKinsey will pay almost $600 million to settle several lawsuits over its role in the opioid crisis, including offering marketing advice to Purdue Pharma. The largest settlement is for $573 million, which Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey describes in a video.

Healey’s presentation and delivery are interesting because she represents families and is speaking for 47 attorneys general in several U.S. states. Her anger is evident, but her audience is small: only 53 views one week after it’s posted, and at least three of those are me. What are the communication objectives? This will make a good class discussion.

McKinsey’s response is also interesting for students studying business communication and character. In an email to staff, Global Managing Partner Kevin Sneader describes “setting a higher standard.” Whereas the governors consider McKinsey’s actions unlawful, Sneader does not agree:

“Indeed, while our past work with opioid manufacturers was lawful and never intended to do harm, we have always held ourselves to a higher bar. We fell short of that bar. We did not adequately acknowledge the epidemic unfolding in our communities or the terrible impact of opioid misuse and addiction, and for that I am deeply sorry.”

The Massachusetts court filing explains the legal argument.

At some point in 2019, two McKinsey executives debated in emails “eliminating all our documents and emails.” These executives have been terminated. (See McKinsey communications.)

Rhetorical Devices in Super Bowl Ads

The Michelob ULTRA Super Bowl commercial demonstrates two rhetorical devices well. One is anaphora: “After the…., “After the…,” “After the…”

Chiasmus is also illustrated by “Are you happy because you win, or do you win because you’re happy?” This is an ABBA construction.

Rhetorical devices can be overused and hokey, but in ads they’re memorable, and these are good examples.

Robinhood CEO Defends Decision to Block Trading

It’s been a wild week of investing in GameStop, AMC, and other companies, with amateur investors driving up prices. Investment app Robinhood decided to halt trading and was highly criticized. Robinhood was accused of not having enough liquidity to cover trades, succumbing to pressure from hedge funds, and trying to protect investors, yet interfering with their trading decisions and opportunities to gain high returns.

In a CNBC interview with Andrew Ross Sorkin, CEO Vlad Tenev defends the company’s decision to block trading. He denies the accusations but does mention the liquidity and responsibility. How clear is his explanation?

His video is a good one to analyze for his delivery skills and appearance. His skin and wall colors are rather pink, and although he sounds confident, he could move his upper body more to seem relaxed. Fillers signal a conversational style, which is appropriate here, but he overuses “um,” and I find it distracting.

Rhetorical Devices and More in Amanda Gorman's Inaugural Poem

Amanda Gorman, a highly accomplished young poet, gave a riveting presentation at President Joe Biden’s inauguration ceremony. Her precise, engaging delivery—gestures, eye contact, pacing, modulation, etc.—is a lesson for communication students planning business presentations.

The poem demonstrates an extraordinary number of rhetorical devices: alliteration, assonance, anaphora, metaphors, allusions, and more. Whether or not you agree with her remarks in “The Hill We Climb,” the poem has all the marks of a speech that engages the audience and brings them along on a journey.

Tech CEOs Testify Before Congress

CEOs of four major tech companies—Google, Facebook, Apple, and Amazon—answered U.S. lawmakers’ questions about potential abuses of power. Themes from both Democrats and Republicans included relationships with third-parties, social media monitoring, advertising, search results, and other potential antitrust moves.

The CEOs joined by video and started with an opening statement. After that, no one was spared tough questions. Sundar Pichai was grilled about search engine results and Google’s business in China. Mark Zuckerberg defended its acquisition strategy. Jeff Bezos responded to accusations of using vendors’ data to build competitive products. And Tim Cook, who received the fewest questions, defended practices for developers, including fees charged through the App Store.

Discussion:

• Watch the CEOs’ opening statements. Which were the strongest and weakest? On what criteria do you base your analysis?

• Which leadership character dimensions do the CEOs exhibit or fail to exhibit.

• Assess the CEOs’ delivery skills. What differences and similarities do you notice?

• Now assess the technology set-up: lighting, background, camera angle, eye contact, and so on. What lessons do you learn for your own video meetings?

Atlanta Mayor Speaks to Protests

Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms delivered a speech from the heart and from her experience. Mayor Bottoms speaks from her experience as an African-American mother and implores people to protest peacefully.

Discussion:

• Analyze the mayor’s speech: audience, communication objectives, organization, tone, delivery style, and so on. What works well, and what could be improved?

• In what ways does this speech demonstrate authenticity? How does the mayor’s identity play a role in her message and her delivery?

New Zealand PM's Conversational Style

In business communication courses, many faculty encourage their students to use a natural, conversational style—to avoid reading from a script or memorizing a speech. A natural style allows speakers to connect with their audience and to demonstrate authenticity.

New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern posted a video to “check in with everyone.” She is in a sweatshirt and says she just put her toddler to bed. Ardern discuss COVID-19 progress and asks people not to be “disheartened” by numbers, which may lag isolating behaviors.

In early April, PM Ardern declared that the tooth fairy and Easter bunny are considered essential workers.

Discussion:

• Ardern uses fillers when she speaks—in other videos even more so than this one. Is that a problem? Why or why not?

• How do you perceive her natural style: refreshing, inappropriate, or something else?

• How would her style be perceived if she were the president of the U.S.?
  

Airlines CEOs Criticize Boeing CEO's Prediction

During an interview on the “Today” show, Savannah Guthrie asked Boeing CEO David Calhoun whether a major U.S. airline might not survive because of the pandemic. Calhoun said, “Well, I don’t want to get too predictive on that subject, but yes, most likely. Something will happen when September comes around.” He also said that “we believe we will return to a growth rate similar to the past, but it might take us three, five years to get there.” 

The response angered major airline executives, who are currently negotiating for federal assistance.

Another Boeing executive defended Calhoun’s statement:

“Some weren’t keen on his sobering assessment of industry challenges ahead, but others appreciated him telling it like it is. It’s in his nature to be frank.”

Discussion:

• What’s your view of Calhoun’s comment? One view is that, during a global pandemic, executives might need to be particularly sensitive. Another view is that this is a time for honest, direct talk.

• What are the potential implications of his comment? Should he have avoided it?

• What the entire interview. How did Calhoun do overall? What are his communication objectives and key messages?

Governor Cuomo's Leadership

A Wall Street Journal article analyzes NY Governor Cuomo’s leadership during the coronavirus pandemic. Crisis communication experts conclude that, although he’s not a naturally gifted orator, he is doing what the public needs now.

People appreciate the governor’s focus on facts and his direct style as well as his discussions of emotion and his brother’s illness, which “humanize” him.

The article sites Cuomo’s current popularity: “Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s job-performance rating soared in March to its highest level ever, according to a poll conducted by the Siena College Research Institute.”

Performer Randy Rainbow produced a funny video, “ANDY!” to the tune of “Sandy” from the musical Grease about his appreciation.  

Discussion:

• Read the article for other conclusions about the governor’s leadership style. With which ideas do you agree and disagree?

• What other examples have you seen of people stepping up when the situation required them to be leaders? How did they do?

Misleading NY Covid-19 Chart

Thanks to Carl Quintanilla for posting this example of a misleading chart. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has been lauded for his leadership during the coronavirus crisis, yet critics say one of the mainstay charts in his news conferences shows a skewed story.

When he shows this chart, Governor Cuomo describes, the decreasing numbers of new hospitalizations. The chart title is clear: “Change in Total Hospitalizations.” But what does the visual imply?

Similarly, he shows “Change in ICU Admissions” (approx.00:35 in the video).

Discussion:

• Watch the first minute of the news conference. Is he clear, or could he be clearer in his explanation?

• What’s your view of the two charts? Are they misleading? What are the possible consequences of showing the data in a misleading way?

• How, if at all, should these charts be changed?

WHO Official Bungles Interview

World Health Organization (WHO) senior adviser Bruce Alyward wanted to avoid a reporter’s question about Taiwan becoming a member of the organization. A video of the interview shows an awkward exchange, with Alyward remaining silent (but we still see him moving and hear sounds), saying “Sorry, I couldn’t hear your question,” asking the reporter to move onto another question, and then, finally, ending the call. During a follow-up call, Alyward refers to China and then abruptly ends the call.

Taiwan has had good success in controlling COVID-19, and the government claims to have warned the WHO back in December 2019 about the contagion.

As of today, Alyward’s name is removed from WHO’s website listing advisers to the organization.

Discussion:

• What is a better way for Alyward to have handled the reporter’s question?

• Why do you think the WHO ignored warnings from the Taiwanese government?

Marriott CEO Demonstrates Authenticity

A Forbes article calls him an “authentic leader” and applauds his video about the business. Marriott CEO Arne Sorenson begins by talking about his appearance: he is undergoing treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Sorenson gives the bad news directly: the company hit from COVID-19 is worse than the impact from 9/11 and the 2009 financial recession combined. He compares the worst quarter in the company’s history—about a 25% revenue decline—to the almost immediate 90% decline today.

Towards the end of the video, Sorenson is visibly emotional as he talks about employees losing their jobs.

Discussion:

• What principles of delivering bad news does Sorensen use in the video?

• How well does Sorenson balance emotional appeal, logic, and credibility in this message?

• In addition to authenticity, what other leadership character dimensions does Sorenson demonstrate?

Tourism CEOs Meet with President Trump

President Trump invited CEOs of major tourism companies to discuss the COVID-19 response.

Hilton CEO Christopher Nassetta began by highlighting issues in the industry:

“Hilton’s been around 100 years -- we’ve never closed a hotel that wasn’t going to be demolished or rebuilding, The bulk of our hotels in the major cities are closing as we speak.”

Nassetta was also complimentary to President Trump and Vice President Pence and said that he wanted to protect employees. The president reassured him that they’ll be up and running soon, although both said the situation is currently a “disaster” “all over the world.”

Discussion:

• How would you describe the purpose of this gathering? What are President Trump’s objectives?

• Assess each of the CEOs during the meeting. How well did they represent their brand?

Governor Cuomo's Press Conference

In his second news conference about Coronavirus, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced new cases, provided resources, and answered questions.

Discussion:

• Assess the news conference. What does Governor Cuomo do well, and what suggestions would you have for him to improve his communication?

• What strategies for answering questions does the Governor demonstrate?

MLB Players Dispute Response to Cheating Scandal

Several players have criticized how Major League Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred handled the recent cheating scandal. Calling the Houston Astros’ sign-stealing “the biggest scandal in the sport since the steroid era,” an ESPN writer concludes that “fallout continues.”

In an interview, Manfred explained the decision to recall the Astros’ 2017 World Series title and how the first apology didn’t go over very well. Manfred referred to the World Series trophy as a “piece of metal.” Mike Trout of the Los Angeles Angels spoke against Manfred’s reference:

“For him to devalue it the way he did [Sunday] just tells me how out of touch he is with the players in this game. At this point, the only thing devaluing that trophy is that it says ‘commissioner’ on it.”

Manfred has since apologized:

“In an effort to make a rhetorical point, I referred to the World Series trophy in a disrespectful way, and I want to apologize for that. There’s no excuse for it. I made a mistake. I was trying to make a point, but I should have made it in a more effective way.”

NBA star LeBron James weighed in on Twitter, encouraging the MLB to “listen to your players speaking today about how disgusted, mad, hurt, broken, etc etc about this.” As expected, some appreciated his perspective, while others didn’t.

Manfred image source .

Discussion:

• What’s your view of the controversy? Are you also critical of Manfred’s handling of the situation?

• How well did Manfred handle the criticism of his “piece of metal” comment?

• Should LeBron James have entered the debate, or should he have avoided it, as some suggest? Why or why not?

Apologies About the Iowa App

The New York Times published “everything that went wrong at the Iowa Caucases,” and it’s a long list about the app. The technology was untested and unfamiliar to volunteers, and connection problems prevented accurate data submission and reporting.

An opinion writer blamed “techno-utopianism and laziness” for the trouble: “The two fuel each other: The overarching belief that software will fix everything leads to slapdash engineering, procurement and deployment.”

Troy Price, the Iowa Democratic Party Chair, apologized for the “multiple reporting challenges.” He explains the decision to delay reporting to ensure “accuracy and integrity.”

The CEO of Shadow, the app company, also apologized:

“We sincerely regret the delay in the reporting of the results of last night's Iowa caucuses and the uncertainty it has caused to the candidates, their campaigns, and Democratic caucus-goers. As the Iowa Democratic Party has confirmed, the underlying data and collection process via Shadow's mobile caucus app was sound and accurate, but our process to transmit that caucus results data generated via the app to the IDP was not. Importantly, this issue did not affect the underlying caucus results data. We worked as quickly as possible overnight to resolve this issue, and the IDP has worked diligently to verify results. Shadow is an independent, for-profit technology company that contracted with the Iowa Democratic Party to build a caucus reporting mobile app, which was optional for local officials to use. The goal of the app was to ensure accuracy in a complex reporting process. We will apply the lessons learned in the future, and have already corrected the underlying technology issue. We take these issues very seriously, and are committed to improving and evolving to support the Democratic Party's goal of modernizing its election processes."

Discussion:

• Analyze each of these apologies: the audiences, communication objectives, writing style, organization, delivery choice, etc. Each message has distinct purposes.

• What works well in these statements, and what could be improved?

Carlos Ghosn's News Conference

Former head of Nissan Motor Co. and Renault SA Carlos Ghosn delivered a news conference from Lebanon after his escape from Japan. Ghosn was arrested in Tokyo in 2018 for misreporting income and misusing company funds. He left through a well-orchestrated exit in a box by private plane to his home country.

In what the Guardian calls “a lengthy and often rambling press conference in Beirut,” Ghosn spoke in four languages to defend himself. He criticized the Japanese criminal justice system and accused the Japanese government of working with Nissan executives to conspire against him.

Ghosn was adamant about his innocence:

“I don’t consider myself as a prisoner in Lebanon. I prefer this prison to the one before. I am ready to stay a long time in Lebanon, but I am going to fight because I have to clear my name.”

The Japan Times reports that the new conference “will have done little to turn the tide of public opinion in Japan and restore his reputation, which has been tainted by his alleged financial wrongdoing.” A former prosecutor in Japan said, “Ghosn didn’t have anything substantive to say. If he wants to restore trust, he shouldn’t do a self-absorbed speech like he did, but he should calmly make specific explanations and present evidence supporting those explanations.”

Discussion:

• Watch parts of the news conference. How well does Ghosn restore his image and prove his innocence?

• How should Ghosn communicate differently if he wants better outcomes?

Prince Andrew's BBC Interview Does Not Go Well

Prince Andrew took a BBC interview to explain his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, who had served prison time for having sex with a minor. The Duke of York spent a night at Epstein’s mansion, which some victims called a ”House of Horrors.” The Duke is shown in photographs, along with photos of young women coming into and leaving the house. One woman claims that, when she was 17, she was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew. Since that time, Epstein committed suicide in jail, where he was facing sex trafficking charges.

Prince Andrew told the BBC interviewer, “I kick myself for on a daily basis because it was not something that was becoming of a member of the Royal Family and we try and uphold the highest standards and practices and I let the side down, simple as that."

When asked about his stay at the mansion, Prince Andrew replied, "It was a convenient place to stay. I mean I've gone through this in my mind so many times. At the end of the day, with a benefit of all the hindsight that one can have, it was definitely the wrong thing to do. But at the time I felt it was the honourable and right thing to do and I admit fully that my judgement was probably coloured by my tendency to be too honourable but that's just the way it is."

He also referred to Epstein’s behavior as unbecoming: “Do I regret the fact that he has quite obviously conducted himself in a manner unbecoming? Yes.” When questioned, he said, “I’m sorry. I’m being polite. I mean in the sense that he was a sex offender.”

Responses to the interview have been negative. Since the interview, AON, Cisco, KMPG, and a British charity have removed or are considering removing their brand affiliations with the prince’s name and his work.

Prince Andrew has since tweeted his sympathy and decision to “step back from public duties for the foreseeable future.”

Discussion:

• Describe the arguments for and against Prince Andrew’s decision to take the BBC interview.

• Looking at the BBC interview, do you think he could have handled the situation better? What could he have done differently?

• Analyze the prince’s tweet. What’s your view of that decision and communication? How well is the prince managing the fallout?

• What leadership character dimensions are illustrated by this situation?

Conversational Voice Tone for Polling

Pollsters have a tough time getting people to answer their phones, no less answer questions about who they might vote for in the next presidential election. With such low response rates, callers have to sound conversational and personable, just as business presenters have to engage to their audience.

In a Daily Podcast, pollsters describe how to avoid sounding robotic, which is particularly difficult when you’re “reading off a screen.” The same applies to presenters who read from their notes or slides.

Discussion:

• What principles of voice tone do the pollsters’ examples in the audio clip illustrate?

• How can you apply these principles to your business presentations?